Friday, 24 April 2015

Reflective Synopsis



The use of ICT in the classroom is embedded in the professional standards for teachers in Australia and explicitly outlined in the Australian curriculum (AITSL, n.d.; ACARA, n.d). As teachers, therefore, we have an imperative to embrace the use of ICT. But how can ICT be used to support and enhance learning? This question can be answered by examining e-learning theories and research into ICT use in educational settings.

Moving Beyond Fun
It is often implied that ICT is fun and automatically engages and motivates students. This is a simplistic view of the potential of ICT (Squire, 2005). Every time we use ICT, we must carefully consider how it enhances the lesson and whether or not its use is directly related to the learning objectives (Reynard, 2008). Throughout our reflections, I found the SAMR model particularly useful for examining my use of ICT (Puentedura, 2014). 


Implicit in the SAMR model is the idea that some uses of technology involve higher order thinking skills (HOTS) such as evaluation and creation, and others do not. This difference is important. A 1998 study by Wenglinsky  revealed that using ICT to teach lower order thinking skills had a negative impact on students’ achievement, in contrast to the positive association when learners were using ICT to engage in HOTS. We cannot assume that providing a technology-rich environment will automatically translate to gains for learners. Instead, it is how we use the technology to promote HOTS that is critical (Papanastasiou, Zemblyas, & Vrasidas, 2003; Sivin-Kachala & Bialo, 2000). 

Digital Pedagogy & the TPACK Framework
Digital pedagogy is the study of how to effectively use ICT in the classroom. The TPACK framework in particular is helpful in considering how to use technology to facilitate student learning. It is the idea that an expert teacher is one who can create links between what is to be learned (content), how it is taught (pedagogy) and the appropriate tools to do this (technology) (Teaching Teachers for the Future, n.d.).

Although there is general TPACK that may be transferred from one learning area to another, there is also a need to develop specific TPACK for your particular learning area. In our reflections, I discovered differences in the way I was using ICT in the science classroom and the Japanese language classroom (http://sakasamas0267898.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/reflection-4-week-5.html). An example of different uses for NHS audio suite in four subjects is outlined below.


 
I have begun to create my own personal ICT library through our weekly blog posts and develop an understanding of how these affordances can be best utilised in each of my teaching areas. I’m keen to benefit from the experience of expert teachers, and to share what I create and learn.

The Benefits of Using ICT in the Classroom
ICT can transform learning by opening up possibilities that are impossible to conceive in regular face-to-face classroom settings. Some examples of this are using blogs to connect with students in another country, or working collaboratively with experts from a university through a wiki or Google Docx. This is constructivism and connectivism at its best; through tools which allow us to transcend distance, and participate as global citizens. 

Another way digital tools can enhance learning is when they are used to make adjustments for students with disability (Broderick, Mehta-Parekh & Reid, 2005). Potential uses include audio versions of texts, large print on visual media through to adaptive technologies such as speech recognition software or Braille embossers. ICT can assist with differentiating learning. If material is presented in an interactive multimodal format such as a glog, students can proceed at their own pace, which caters for those who want to extend themselves to those who need more time to process the information. I think ICT can play an incredibly useful role in creating an inclusive classroom and help us fulfil our responsibility to provide learning opportunities for students across a full range of abilities (AITSL, n.d.).

The Risks Associated with Digital Tools
Digital tools can enhance learning, but the use of these tools is not without risk. After having assessed the pedagogical implications of a particular tool, it is then necessary to look at how it can be used safely, ethically and legally. I have developed a three point strategy that I plan to use with students to make them aware of the risks associated with ICT use.


I think that if students are aware of the risks and involved in deciding upon mitigating strategies, they are more likely to abide by them. Here is a sample of what an agreed upon set of rules for a particular tool could look like:




Future Directions
The past six weeks have provided a glimpse of what can be achieved with ICT. I think there is overwhelming evidence that a technology-rich learning environment can support and enhance students learning, provided a good framework is used to select the ICT and how it will be used. Each week I’ve made an effort to shift my natural inclination to use ICT to instruct to instead focus on how students could use ICT to learn. I’m excited to have begun learning how to facilitate the journey of students from passive consumers of text to active participants in the creation and dissemination of media and knowledge through ICT. 

References

AITSL.  (n.d.). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list

Broderick, A., Mehta-Parekh, H. & Reid, D.K. (2005) Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 194-202.

Papanastasiou, E., Zemblyas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (3), 325-332.

Pipl. Retrieved from https://pipl.com/

Puentedura, R. R. (November, 2014)  SAMR in the classroom: Developing sustainable practice. Ruben R. Puentedura’s weblog. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/11/28/SAMRInTheClassroom_DevelopingSustainablePractice.pdf

Reynard, R. (2008). Avoiding the 5 Most Common Mistakes in Using Blogs with Students. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/articles/2008/10/avoiding-the-5-most-common-mistakes-in-using-blogs-with-students.aspx

Sivin-Kachala, J. & Bialo, E. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington,DC: Software and Information Industry Association.

Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate, 1 (6). Available from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/Changing%20The%20Game-final_2.pdf

Teaching Teachers for the Future (n.d.). What is TPACK? Retrieved from http://www.ttf.edu.au/what-is-tpack/what-is-tpack.html

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton,N.J.: ETS Policy Information Center.


Friday, 17 April 2015

Reflection 5, Week 6



This week we are looking at Group 4 tools, which included:
                                   
* Interactive Learning Objects
* Adobe Flash
* Google Earth
* Google Maps
* Google Docx
* Online concept mapping
* Online timelines
* Zooburst
* Museumbox

I looked at quite a few of these tools, but this week I will be focusing on the online timeline tool called Dipity and a concept mapping tool.

My Lesson Plan

In the year 7 science curriculum, students undertake a unit on water. Within this unit, they explore solvents and solutes and techniques for separating mixtures such as chromatography.

In my lesson plan, students are told that they are forensic investigators with a crime scene unit and that a teacher has been kidnapped. The scene is set with the use of Dipity, an online Timeline tool.

Dipity: an online timeline tool

Dipity is very easy to use and quick to put together. Here is a look at how it can work for a classroom setting:



Setting the crime scene: mind maps and prezi
Following this, I would ask students to brainstorm what kind of evidence might have been collected. They could present this in a mind map if time permitted. This would be an ideal time to introduce the students to mind mapping tools with a simple mind map that only required text. For this, tools such as bubbl.us work well and are easy to use.

Next, I would let the students explore the Prezi which gives them the timeline to view for themselves and other evidence that has been collected and requires analysis. The evidence has been collected and uploaded, including fingerprints, fibre (fabric) samples and a chromatogram of a sample of the ransom note.




After the students had investigated the use of fingerprints and fibre samples, they could investigate the ransom note through chromatography. Ideally students would come to the conclusion that chromatography could be used to investigate the ransom note themselves (after having studied the concept in a previous lesson). I would prepare pens collected from each suspect (water soluble black pens), and let them use a coffee filter to examine which pen was the one used to write the ransom note.

Students Present: MuseumBox?
It was at this stage in my planning that I ran into some ICT issues. I had planned to have the students upload their results for each piece of evidence and create a Museumbox of the perpetrator. Museumbox allows students to present information (images, text, video and audio) on each facet of a cube. I had hoped it would function as a kind of “murder board”, like all the good TV detectives use.

Initially when I was planning out this lesson, I had a quick look at Museumbox and determined it would meet my needs. I then continued on with my lesson development and made my Prezi. In theory, the students would make the Museumbox themselves, but I had decided that it would be best if I attempted one myself (mostly because this course requires that I demonstrate I’ve tried the tool). This turned out to be a good call, because it seems that Museumbox now requires a subscription (per school).


After some panicked moments, I decided all was not lost. I simply needed another way to create a “murder board”. Preferably one that involved one of the Group 4 tools, because the point of this endeavour was to complete my reflection for week 6. I calmed down when I realised that a mind mapping tool would accomplish the same thing. It even looked and felt more like a trusty TV detective murder board. All good.

Until I tried to create one in bubbl.us and discovered that if I wanted to be able to add images (such as a chromatogram), I would need to upgrade from the free version. Panic stations, once more.

Finally, after some googling, I discovered another mind mapping tool called MindMup. Should you ever find yourself scrambling for a free mind mapping tool that can cope with images, this one fits the bill:

It also allows you to add attachments, create storyboards and collaborate in real time. I did have an issue with trying to publish a mind map that contained images. The free version only allows you publish or save mind maps that are up to 100kb, which pretty much rules out the use of images. The way around this is to save it to Google Drive. So I also checked that out, and if you have a google account, it’s a very simple process. The realtime collaboration feature also works through google drive, and I can see that this feature would be very useful if students are working in groups and brainstorming.

I was really impressed with the MindMup tool. Here is a PMI:




So after some minor panic attacks, I found a solution and came up with this mock up of what I would like students to achieve at the end of the activities:




The idea is that they would then present their evidence to me and the class to prove that their chosen suspect is indeed the perpetrator. This would require higher order thinking skills such as evaluating the evidence, choosing the most important pieces of evidence for inclusion in the MindMup and then conveying and defending their ideas.


The Lesson for Me

The key thing I realised this week is that even if my plan is for the students to make use of the ICT as opposed to me using the tool to present material, I still need to invest the same amount of time in the ICT. I need to explore it fully, so that I can guide the students. In the end, I had decided to imagine that I were a student and complete the task myself. And thank goodness I did. I can’t imagine what a disaster this lesson would have been if I had just flicked through the MuseumBox website, decided it looked good and then instructed the students to use it in class.

What I’ve learnt is this: when you tell a student to use an ICT tool, you had better know that you could complete the task yourself. Have a go at using the tool before you tell the students to use it. You never know what hiccups you might uncover (like requiring a paid subscription!).


 References
ACARA.  (n.d.). Year 7 plan – Australian Curriculum: Science. Retrieved from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/p_10/ac_science_yr7_plan.doc

Dipity tutorial
Retrieved April 13, 2015

Retrieved April 13, 2015

Retrieved April 13, 2015