Friday, 24 April 2015

Reflective Synopsis



The use of ICT in the classroom is embedded in the professional standards for teachers in Australia and explicitly outlined in the Australian curriculum (AITSL, n.d.; ACARA, n.d). As teachers, therefore, we have an imperative to embrace the use of ICT. But how can ICT be used to support and enhance learning? This question can be answered by examining e-learning theories and research into ICT use in educational settings.

Moving Beyond Fun
It is often implied that ICT is fun and automatically engages and motivates students. This is a simplistic view of the potential of ICT (Squire, 2005). Every time we use ICT, we must carefully consider how it enhances the lesson and whether or not its use is directly related to the learning objectives (Reynard, 2008). Throughout our reflections, I found the SAMR model particularly useful for examining my use of ICT (Puentedura, 2014). 


Implicit in the SAMR model is the idea that some uses of technology involve higher order thinking skills (HOTS) such as evaluation and creation, and others do not. This difference is important. A 1998 study by Wenglinsky  revealed that using ICT to teach lower order thinking skills had a negative impact on students’ achievement, in contrast to the positive association when learners were using ICT to engage in HOTS. We cannot assume that providing a technology-rich environment will automatically translate to gains for learners. Instead, it is how we use the technology to promote HOTS that is critical (Papanastasiou, Zemblyas, & Vrasidas, 2003; Sivin-Kachala & Bialo, 2000). 

Digital Pedagogy & the TPACK Framework
Digital pedagogy is the study of how to effectively use ICT in the classroom. The TPACK framework in particular is helpful in considering how to use technology to facilitate student learning. It is the idea that an expert teacher is one who can create links between what is to be learned (content), how it is taught (pedagogy) and the appropriate tools to do this (technology) (Teaching Teachers for the Future, n.d.).

Although there is general TPACK that may be transferred from one learning area to another, there is also a need to develop specific TPACK for your particular learning area. In our reflections, I discovered differences in the way I was using ICT in the science classroom and the Japanese language classroom (http://sakasamas0267898.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/reflection-4-week-5.html). An example of different uses for NHS audio suite in four subjects is outlined below.


 
I have begun to create my own personal ICT library through our weekly blog posts and develop an understanding of how these affordances can be best utilised in each of my teaching areas. I’m keen to benefit from the experience of expert teachers, and to share what I create and learn.

The Benefits of Using ICT in the Classroom
ICT can transform learning by opening up possibilities that are impossible to conceive in regular face-to-face classroom settings. Some examples of this are using blogs to connect with students in another country, or working collaboratively with experts from a university through a wiki or Google Docx. This is constructivism and connectivism at its best; through tools which allow us to transcend distance, and participate as global citizens. 

Another way digital tools can enhance learning is when they are used to make adjustments for students with disability (Broderick, Mehta-Parekh & Reid, 2005). Potential uses include audio versions of texts, large print on visual media through to adaptive technologies such as speech recognition software or Braille embossers. ICT can assist with differentiating learning. If material is presented in an interactive multimodal format such as a glog, students can proceed at their own pace, which caters for those who want to extend themselves to those who need more time to process the information. I think ICT can play an incredibly useful role in creating an inclusive classroom and help us fulfil our responsibility to provide learning opportunities for students across a full range of abilities (AITSL, n.d.).

The Risks Associated with Digital Tools
Digital tools can enhance learning, but the use of these tools is not without risk. After having assessed the pedagogical implications of a particular tool, it is then necessary to look at how it can be used safely, ethically and legally. I have developed a three point strategy that I plan to use with students to make them aware of the risks associated with ICT use.


I think that if students are aware of the risks and involved in deciding upon mitigating strategies, they are more likely to abide by them. Here is a sample of what an agreed upon set of rules for a particular tool could look like:




Future Directions
The past six weeks have provided a glimpse of what can be achieved with ICT. I think there is overwhelming evidence that a technology-rich learning environment can support and enhance students learning, provided a good framework is used to select the ICT and how it will be used. Each week I’ve made an effort to shift my natural inclination to use ICT to instruct to instead focus on how students could use ICT to learn. I’m excited to have begun learning how to facilitate the journey of students from passive consumers of text to active participants in the creation and dissemination of media and knowledge through ICT. 

References

AITSL.  (n.d.). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list

Broderick, A., Mehta-Parekh, H. & Reid, D.K. (2005) Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 194-202.

Papanastasiou, E., Zemblyas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (3), 325-332.

Pipl. Retrieved from https://pipl.com/

Puentedura, R. R. (November, 2014)  SAMR in the classroom: Developing sustainable practice. Ruben R. Puentedura’s weblog. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/11/28/SAMRInTheClassroom_DevelopingSustainablePractice.pdf

Reynard, R. (2008). Avoiding the 5 Most Common Mistakes in Using Blogs with Students. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/articles/2008/10/avoiding-the-5-most-common-mistakes-in-using-blogs-with-students.aspx

Sivin-Kachala, J. & Bialo, E. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington,DC: Software and Information Industry Association.

Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate, 1 (6). Available from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/Changing%20The%20Game-final_2.pdf

Teaching Teachers for the Future (n.d.). What is TPACK? Retrieved from http://www.ttf.edu.au/what-is-tpack/what-is-tpack.html

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton,N.J.: ETS Policy Information Center.


No comments:

Post a Comment